🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 787+ reviews
Outdoorβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(787 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$26
$43.33
Sale
βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

This price is for both of them

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift dispatch
↩️
functional Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside

This price is for both of them​

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1015327

Category: Outdoor > Watering Equipment > Rain Barrels

Original Price:$43.33 USD

Sale Price:$26 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6520 reviews
MK
Megan King
4 months ago Β· fresh York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really terrific
I didn’t notice any defects on the Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside.
8 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
So happy with this
The Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside feels reasonably well made.
10 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase 
1 month ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Highly satisfied
The Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside feels tough and reliable.
22 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Worth every penny
In daily use, it feels okay and it works for me.
35 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI 
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
No complaints
After a few days, the Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside performs as expected which is good enough. Works fine so far.
16 people found this helpful