🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 411+ reviews
Menβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.7 out of 5(411 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15.95
$26.58
Sale
βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : NormalPattern : CheckedArticle number : M3I82O05B-K12

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift dispatch
↩️
functional Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts

Rise : Normal
Pattern : Checked
Article number : M3I82O05B-K12

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1472351

Category: Men > Clothing > Underwear & Socks

Original Price:$26.58 USD

Sale Price:$15.95 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9200 reviews
AP​
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
At first, the GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts works well enough and I’m satisfied.
42 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So glad I bought this
The GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts is fine if you’re not expecting premium quality.
20 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
To be fair, it is practical which feels reasonable.
13 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
treasure this GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts!
The GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts works consistently so far.
30 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
From my experience, the GINGHAM POPLIN - Boxer shorts works fine so it’s acceptable.
36 people found this helpful